IP meeting with BCA Architects and Engineering Merged

Winning the Work Most projects won through interviews Show renders and past projects to show skills Does not have a high-quality visualization workflow established Most projects are schools/institutional Very fiscally minded Schematic Design Uses conceptual, non-realistic visualizations Cardboard style MEP Engineers rarely get involved at this stage Ex. Concert halls need engineers involved early on Want to be drought in during DD Design Development Collaboration between architects and engineers begins Technology used: MEP P Pack for Revit Civil Engineers work in Civil3D (will not go into Revit) Would love to be able to visualize daylight simulations, solar autonomy, energy, air flow,acoustics, etc. Data needs to be readable and visual Construction Documentation Depends on the project, but usually goes to bid Visualization will typically taper off Will be used as another level of communication to help resolve communication issues Technology used: Typically Procore Post Construction No engagement postconstruction Operation Management software needs to be easier and more focused on the owner use case Data and price need to align in order for an owner to invest in a solution Main data for unsophisticated building managers: MEP equipmentowarranty info roof information Client Communication Uses Enscape to walk clients through the space Live through Revit Helps to tell the story Uses QR codes Proof of Concepts: Energy and Daylight Analysis Has great value Already does a lot of glare andlighting analysis Invaluable, will help architects understand Revit Filters Sees value Annotation and Markup Sees value Enscape as a medium is better connected to the designer than software like Revizto Animated assets More so than justidle animations Visualizations for simulations